no...its better to receiver from the Receiver

In the last few months, I have drafted dozens and dozens of Motions for a Receiver over debtors who have failed to satisfy the judgments that I have obtained against them. This effort has been an inordinate success. Indeed, just last week, I obtained a receiver over a debtor, that I will call Mr. X. It turns out that Mr. X has several accounts at a well known brokerage house. Now that I have a receiver appointed over Mr. X, its a simple matter of having the receiver take the funds out of Mr. X's accounts to satisfy the $200,000 that he owes to my client.

I have also found that having a receiver, in many instances, is enough to convince a debtor to pay a judgment voluntarily.

I have been asking the various courts to appoint Franklin Gettleson, who is a well respected attorney and a certified public accountant. The courts, without hesitation, have all been agreeable. I highly recommend this collection technique. Its effective and will get your money collected.